Microfinance

Submitted by Francisco Noguera on August 25, 2008 - 16:14.
Published in:
August 19, 2008 - 16:00, Spiegel Online
Big Finance Muscles In on Microlending

By Uwe Buse

Microloans were invented to help the poorest of the poor help themselves. Now major banks and pension funds are getting into the business, as they discover that the interest paid by the poor can produce high returns. Is it aid or exploitation?

Yunus has an opinion on almost everything, and he is quick to express it. But when it comes to Shafiqual Haque Choudhury, Yunus suddenly becomes a man of few words, barely able to choke out "we'll see."Like Yunus, Shafiqual Haque Choudhury is also involved in the business of eliminating poverty. Choudhury, too, is eloquent, and clearly loves speaking to large audiences, but when he is asked about Yunus, he says, tersely: "He has his achievements."

Yunus and Choudhury both live in Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh, a densely packed metropolis that expands farther into the surrounding countryside everyday. Both Yunus and Choudhury have built skyscrapers among the city's run-down shacks. And there is another similarity: Both manage banks. Yunus is permitted to use the word bank to refer to his organization, Grameen Bank. But for legal reasons Choudhury's organization, ASA, cannot call itself a bank. It is formally a non-governmental organization (NGO).

Submitted by Rob Katz on August 25, 2008 - 13:59.
Published in:
August 25, 2008 - 13:00, Business Standard
Compartamos versus Yunus

The Mexican micro-finance entity that raised $400 million from an IPO comes under fire for becoming the moneylender the micro-finance institutions were supposed to protect the poor from.

A crimson and red screen lights up and a clutch of golden fish stream left and then right. This is the home page of the website of Compartamos Banco, the Mexican entity that became the first micro-finance institution (MFI) in Latin America to raise equity capital, as much as $400 million, through an initial public offer last year. The MFI, formerly an NGO, which turned into a for-profit entity and then into a bank, decided to turn to the market to reach out to more poor. So what is wrong?

Today, Compartamos is the biggest success story/controversy in the micro-finance world, depending on which side you are.
Submitted by David Lehr on August 7, 2008 - 21:10.
Published in:

Last month, the Silicon Valley Microfinance Network cosponsored "Microfinance West: The Investment Opportunity Conference." This event, which brought together some of the leading commercial players in the microfinance field, was heavily geared towards institutional and retail investors in the financial community. The topics ran the gamut from attracting capital to mitigating risk to benchmarking against other asset classes.

Though the focus was clearly financial, heavyweights from the development side also presented, including Elizabeth Funk, Chairman of the Board of Unitus, and Mary Ellen Iskenderian, President of Women's World Banking. The most provocative comment, however, came from Janine Firpo of Sevak Solutions as she described the evolution of financial services in the US and how technology has continued to lower the costs of transactions.

Warning the audience in advance, Janine shared her thoughts on an area that many might consider to be heretical. She challenged the attendees to question whether default rates on microfinance loans were really the right place to focus, or if in fact the emphasis on achieving 99% repayment rates might be somewhat misguided. Most microfinance institutions today follow a high-touch model, relying on a loan officer that makes frequent visits to his or her clients to collect loan payments and continually reinforce their need to repay. While this has been extremely effective it is also inherently unscalable; as the client base increases, the number of loan officers needed to serve them must also increase.

(This post continues past the break; click "Read More" to continue)
. . . . .
Submitted by Joseph Bornstein on July 23, 2008 - 10:43.
July 22, 2008 - 10:00, Financial Times
Innovations target S Africa’s unbanked

In the higgledy-piggledy streets of Bethelsdorp, a sprawling South African township once designated for people of mixed race, what at first glance appears to be a colourful new youth movement is gathering strength. Adherents sport blue T-shirts and baseball caps and lug brimming satchels. They roam the streets, knocking on the doors of the township's shacks and simple bungalow homes.

In the anarchic days of the apartheid era such youths might have been "comrades" rallying local morale against the police. More recently they might have been members of a nattily dressed new gang. But they are not. They are salespeople for a mobile-telephone-based community-banking scheme.

"We are telling people how easy it is to have a bank account," says Antonio Loots, the community banker for Standard Bank, South Africa's largest bank, who cruises around the township in his ancient BMW overseeing the salespeople. "Places like Bethelsdorp are very remote from traditional banking structures. For an initiative like this to work it must have local input."

Continue reading.
Submitted by Rob Katz on July 17, 2008 - 10:47.
Published in: |
Like any business, base/bottom of the pyramid ventures fail - often. I have neither the space nor the inclination to list those I know of - besides, writers from Erik Simanis to Aneel Karnani to Anand K. Jaiswal have done some of the heavy lifting for me.

We don't talk enough about failed bottom of the pyramid ventures. After all, what CEO wants to risk his company by talking about all the things they did wrong?

Answer: Matt Flannery. The Kiva CEO is incredibly forthright when discussing what they've done well and what they haven't. His latest blog post is practically a how-to guide for talking about failure inside a BoP venture.

(This post continues past the break; click "Read More" to continue)

. . . . .
Submitted by Joseph Bornstein on July 16, 2008 - 11:30.
July 10, 2008 - 11:00, India Today
The Next Billion

Till a few years ago, N. Padmavathy and her six friends were daily-wage workers in an export unit in Chennai, with a monthly income of not more than Rs 2,000.

At times, when she had to pay her children's school fees or take her children to the doctor, she had to borrow at hefty rates from the local money lender.

As a daily-wage worker, she could never predict her income, till she discovered the power of microcredit. A Rs 15,000 loan each, taken by Padmavathy and her six colleagues, has made entrepreneurs of these daily-wage workers. Today, they are the proud owners of a tailoring unit, which is an exclusive franchisee of a leading exporter.

Says P.N. Vasudevan, managing director of Equitas: "The loans we provide not only help the customers improve their business activity levels but also because of lower rates and easy repayment periods, customers can come out of the debt trap laid by money lenders."

Thanks to urban micro-finance institutions (MFIs) like Equitas, Padmavathy and others of her ilk now have access to credit and a better way of life.

Seeing an aching need among this category, often referred to as the Next Billion, a new set of players are coming up in urban hubs to offer financial solutions-primarily credit and insurance-to this economically active group of consumers.

Continue reading.
Submitted by Rob Katz on July 9, 2008 - 10:44.
Published in:
July 07, 2008 - 10:00, Financial Express
Mexican microfinance institution Compartamos breaks silence on IPO

Breaking their silence since their April 2007 IPO, Carlos Danel and Carlos Labarthe, co-founders of Compartamos, the leading Mexican microfinance bank, publish an excerpt of their newly released “Letter to Our Peers” in the latest issue of the magazine Microfinance Insights. The authors, who have been criticized by members of the microfinance community since their IPO brought in extraordinary returns, acknowledge in the letter that social and economic goals can reinforce each other, but state that “there is no agreement on the appropriate levels of the use of profits to achieve this balance.” They explain that the Compartamos IPO, the first for a microfinance institution (MFI), has been an initiative to build the company, and has helped convince the private and the entrepreneurial class that “microfinance is worth pursuing.”
Submitted by Rob Katz on July 8, 2008 - 10:09.
July 07, 2008 - 10:00, Financial Times
Yoghurt maker's recipe for funding social businesses

When it launched a nutrient-rich yoghurt for poor consumers in Bangladesh, Groupe Danone (NYSE:DA) , the French food company, hit an unexpected obstacle. It had trained a large sales and distribution team of women, but only a handful were still working after a week.

The problem, Danone found after talking to a local charity, was that people there did not like women conducting door-to-door sales.

With its partner Grameen, the microfinance institution, Danone decided to talk to community representatives. "We've learned something about managing sales forces of door-to-door saleswomen that are very poor," says Emmanuel Marchant, chief executive of Danone Communities. "It's about understanding the cultural context in which we operate."
Submitted by Joseph Bornstein on July 8, 2008 - 09:30.
Published in: |
July 08, 2008 - 09:00, Financial Express
Mexican microfinance institution Compartamos breaks silence since IPO

Breaking their silence since their April 2007 IPO, Carlos Danel and Carlos Labarthe, co-founders of Compartamos, the leading Mexican microfinance bank, publish an excerpt of their newly released "Letter to Our Peers" in the latest issue of the magazine Microfinance Insights. The authors, who have been criticized by members of the microfinance community since their IPO brought in extraordinary returns, acknowledge in the letter that social and economic goals can reinforce each other, but state that "there is no agreement on the appropriate levels of the use of profits to achieve this balance." They explain that the Compartamos IPO, the first for a microfinance institution (MFI), has been an initiative to build the company, and has helped convince the private and the entrepreneurial class that "microfinance is worth pursuing."

The 2007 Compartamos IPO was a symbol of the sector's exponential growth, and since then there have been other signs of microfinance's movement into the mainstream-a growing number of nonprofit microfinance institutions transforming into regulated entities, more mainstream media coverage, and larger investments from more mainstream investors. It is this movement that is covered in the newest issue of Microfinance Insights--Mainstreaming: Are We Ready for Takeoff?.

Continue reading.
Submitted by Joseph Bornstein on June 30, 2008 - 10:40.
Published in: |
June 30, 2008 - 10:00, Economist
Doing good by doing very nicely indeed

For years Muhammad Yunus reigned as the public face of microfinance. It seemed only right when, in 2006, the Bangladeshi economist cum social entrepreneur and his Grameen Bank shared the Nobel peace prize for a micro-lending revolution that has helped millions to earn their own way out of poverty. Yet for the past year or so, microfinance has had another public face, one that troubles people like Mr Yunus. CompartamosBanco argues that the best way for microfinance to help the poor is for it to make a socking great profit.

Since Compartamos listed its shares for over $1 billion in April 2007, it has stirred up an increasingly fierce debate. To Mr Yunus and its other critics, the Mexican bank is no better than an old-fashioned loan shark, earning its huge profits by charging poor borrowers a usurious interest rate of at least 79% a year. Perhaps sensing opinion turning against it, the bank has belatedly sprung to its own defence, issuing a defiant justification of its business in an 11-page "letter to our peers". And it manages to make a convincing case for its strategy of fighting poverty with profits.

Continue reading.

Submitted by Joseph Bornstein on June 30, 2008 - 09:40.
June 28, 2008 - 09:00, Daily Star
Further international recognition for microfinance programme

MICROCREDIT is undoubtedly the number one image builder for Bangladesh. It has earned the most coveted Nobel (peace) prize for the initiator Dr Muhmmad Yunus and his Grameem Bank. It has earned many other international applauds for the operators, including the recent "Banking at the Bottom of the Pyramid" prize jointly awarded by the Financial Times of London and the International Investment Institute (IFC) to ASA. Mayor of London Boris Johnson formally announced the prize on June 3 selecting the Bangladesh institution from among 129 institutions of 54 countries.

Although a new conception in world economy and development programme, micro credit is gradually gaining a greater importance there. It is considered as a better way to reduce economic discrimination for world peace and security. This new Bangladesh brand is being included in development programmes of various countries in alleviating poverty across the world.

Continue reading.
Submitted by Joseph Bornstein on June 27, 2008 - 10:34.
June 27, 2008 - 10:00, Live Mint: Wall Street Journal
A sunrise industry coming up in West Delhi’s Uttam Nagar

New Delhi: Shyama Kumari has a new-found sense of confidence. The 20-year-old college goer taught part-time at a local school for two years and saved Rs8,000, which she has put in a bank account. Her banker? The local drug store.

Kumari isn’t the only one who banks in a shop and shops in a bank. Around 1,400 people in her neighbourhood, Uttam Nagar—a lower middle class colony in West Delhi—have, through shops that include grocers and chemists, opened accounts that now have between Rs20 and Rs 14,000.

Uttam Nagar is home to India’s first experiment of some scale in what is called mobile phone banking that allows customers to transact with their bank through their cellular phones. Advocates of the technology cheer the possibilities both from the view of potential customers untouched by the banking system yet and from the perspective of banks for whom such a channel reduces costs by as much as half.


Continue reading.
Submitted by Joseph Bornstein on June 26, 2008 - 09:39.
June 26, 2008 - 09:00,
Down to business

It's already launched in Kenya, Afghanistan and Tanzania. And now a mobile money-transfer service from Vodafone is to reach 40 million customers in India. Meanwhile, Microsoft Innovation Centres in Rwanda, Nigeria, Uganda and Morocco are set to provide aspiring business people with the technology to launch new products. And in India, personalised commercial information is being texted to the mobile phones of thousands of farmers in their own language.

These three groundbreaking initiatives were among those revealed at the Business Call To Action conference in May, when CEOs from some of the world's biggest companies unveiled plans designed to both fight poverty and boost business. Hosted by DFID and UNDP, the event also featured President Paul Kagame of Rwanda and President John Kufuor of Ghana. It is the start of a co-ordinated initiative designed to engage the business community with the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) by enabling poor people to access up-to-the-minute information, money and business expertise, as well as creating new commercial and employment opportunities. Big name companies who have already signed up to the Call for Action include Citi Group, Coca-Cola, Diageo, Microsoft, Thomson Reuters and Sumitomo Chemical. Within five years it is estimated that initiatives from these and other companies will save almost half a million lives, create thousands of jobs, and benefit millions of poor people across Africa and Asia.

Continue reading.

Submitted by Joseph Bornstein on June 26, 2008 - 09:16.
June 26, 2008 - 09:00, BYU NewsNet
Micro-Franchises Provide Business Solutions for Poverty

It's no secret in the business world - if you want to start your own business with little risk, you buy a franchise.

For decades, successful American businesses have been franchised, allowing would-be entrepreneurs a safe place to begin their business. Thanks to a team of BYU researchers and developers, the success of franchises is being used to bring people out of poverty through a new initiative called micro-franchise.

For years, economic development practitioners have used micro-finance as a tool to alleviate poverty. Micro-finance organizations give small loans, or micro-loans, to individuals otherwise unable to obtain necessary capital to start or grow a small business.

Many recipients of micro-loans, however, have struggled to get their businesses off the ground, lacking basic business skills.

"Giving micro-credit helps, but it's not the full package," said Jason Fairbourne, micro-franchise initiative director at BYU.

Continue reading.

Submitted by Rob Katz on June 26, 2008 - 08:05.
There have been some interesting base of the pyramid-related topics afoot in both the mainstream media and the blogosphere lately, including a call for water privatization in developing countries and a self-critical blog post authored by the founder of a media-darling BoP startup. Without further ado, what follows is a quick roundup of the latest rumblings and grumblings in the base of the pyramid world:

Water privatization is not a new concept, nor an uncontroversial one. The latest to take up the banner is George Mason economics professor and Marginal Revolution author Tyler Cowen. I admire Cowen and read his blog regularly – he's particularly good at making esoteric economics arguments come alive in readable language. He authored an opinion piece in Forbes back on June 19 entitled Pay For It, in which he argues that government-run water monopolies in developing countries should be completely deregulated.

Of course, Cowen is not blind to the perils of deregulation:
But for all the problems deregulation can bring, the status quo seems much worse. And it's worth asking what these higher prices are relative to. Carrying water on your head costs much more--in terms of both money and effort--than piped water. If you're a poor person, wouldn't you rather face a private monopolist, selling you water through pipes, than not have any water company at all? Whether we like it or not, those are the real world alternatives.
Even so, Cowen's arguments seem awfully academic and not the least bit practical in a real world sense. Yes, base of the pyramid consumers are willing to pay for clean, safe water. But full-on deregulation? It's likely that it would negatively impact the poorest of the poor at the price of improving service for the middle and emerging middle classes. Besides, it's politically infeasible; see Bolivia, Cochabamba.

(This post continues past the break; click "Read More" to continue)

. . . . .
Syndicate content