Strategy

Submitted by Manuel Bueno on September 7, 2008 - 13:29.
Published in: |

In my previous post about Anand Jaiswal’s article, Erik Simanis left a comment adding one more critique to the approach to BoP markets from a producer/consumer framework. In this critique he refers to an article, “Beyond “Basic Needs Business Strategies” that he recently coauthored with Stuart Hart and Duncan Duke. This article offer a very good overview of the current approach that is being developed in their Base of the Pyramid Program and that, by extension, lays the groundwork for their BoP Protocol Initiative. It is written in a clear and concise language, so would I strongly suggest anyone interested in their work to take a look at it. (And for those who want to get a better feeling of what he means, do check out Robert Katz’s interview from last April).

(This post continues past the break; click "Read More" to continue)

. . . . .
Submitted by Rob Katz on August 27, 2008 - 20:50.
Published in: |
August 27, 2008 - 20:00, Business Standard
A Market at the Bottom of the Pyramid?

Over the years, it has become fashionable to talk about the business opportunity offered by those at the bottom of the (economic) pyramid. Many national and international seminars have been conducted to highlight this hitherto undiscovered gold-mine. Any challenge to the business rationale for pursuing such a market is considered heretical and almost blasphemous.
Submitted by Manuel Bueno on August 26, 2008 - 16:10.
Published in: |

Some time ago, we at NextBillion had the pleasure of facilitating a debate about how - and how much - bottom of the pyramid strategy can improve the plight of the poor. The University of Michigan's Aneel Karnani wrote a very insightful paper critiquing various points about the BoP proposition. This paper then received a response by Michigan's C.K. Prahalad and Al Hammond (then at WRI; now at Ashoka).

Recently, a new critique was published by "Innovations: Technology|Governance|Globalization", a journal we have praised already here. The critique, entitled "The Fortune at the Bottom or the Middle of the Pyramid?" is authored by Anand Kumar Jaiswal, from the Indian Institute of Management in Ahmedabad.

As I read his paper, I found myself agreeing with many of his points, similar to when I read Karnani’s publication. This is because Jaiswal, like Karnani, doesn't refute BoP strategies as a means to approaching poverty problems, but rather contends that reality is sometimes more complex than theory, which is why I find it refreshing to read such articles.

(This post continues past the break; click "Read More" to continue)

. . . . .
Submitted by Rob Katz on August 26, 2008 - 09:20.
Published in:
August 03, 2008 - 09:00, Knowledge @ INSEAD
Strong partnership key to success in bottom of the pyramid markets

For those at the ‘bottom of the pyramid’ (BoP), the four billion people or so living on less than two dollars a day, life is hard. Although collectively they have considerable combined purchasing power, they have up to now been traditionally overlooked by businesses. However, major multinational corporations (MNCs) are now seeing opportunities in developing products for the BoP markets, while making a difference to the lives of the poor people.
Submitted by Rob Katz on August 25, 2008 - 14:02.
Published in: |
August 25, 2008 - 14:00, Boston Globe
Going for Gold in India


India obviously has barely touched its potential, still faced with vast poverty, corruption, and infrastructure needs. University of Michigan global management expert C. K. Prahalad this spring told Indian business leaders that if India, which is already producing 3 million college graduates a year, can educate the poor, it will have the world's largest pool of trained people power by 2022.
Submitted by David Lehr on August 21, 2008 - 09:41.

A recent report, "Wireless Technology for Social Change: Trends in NGO Mobile Use," by the United Nations Foundation and The Vodafone Group Foundation highlights emerging trends by NGOs in the use of mobile technology to affect social change in global public health, humanitarian assistance and environmental conservation. While this report offers some great insights on how to use technology and telecom tools to address some of the world's toughest problems, it leaves out one of the most important challenges that NGOs, and most ICT for Development projects face; how toensure sustainability.

To shed some light on this tension, I spoke with Ken Banks, the founder of FrontlineSMS (a tool for mass text messaging) about sustainability and the choices he is currently grappling with. FrontlineSMS was initially funded by Ken's hard work, and more recently by the MacArthur Foundation, to fulfill his belief that "all non-profits, whatever their size and wherever they operate, should be given the opportunity to implement the latest mobile technologies in their work." Today, FrontlineSMS is free for non-profits and is being used by over 40 NGOs in programs around the world.

(This post continues past the break; click "Read More" to continue)

. . . . .
Submitted by Rob Katz on August 19, 2008 - 17:41.
August 19, 2008 - 17:00, Sindh Today
Industry Majors Say They Benefitted From Tapping Rural Markets

New Delhi, Aug 19 (IANS) Four of India’s largest companies Tuesday showcased here how they have benefited by tapping India’s huge rural market.

The four - ICICI Bank, Hindustan Unilever Ltd, Hero Honda Motors and Infosys Technologies - are among the largest in their own areas of business.
Submitted by Rob Katz on August 19, 2008 - 17:37.
Published in: |
August 19, 2008 - 17:00, Livemint.com
BOP Shock for India Inc.

New Delhi: Indian companies seeking their pot of gold from the lower-end or bottom of the pyramid (BOP) consumers are in for a bit of shock: The market may be much smaller in reality. While earlier, this market was supposed to be formed of 400 million people, now market research firms Technopak Advisors and Evalueserve are saying that it is not more than 160 million.
Submitted by Rob Katz on August 19, 2008 - 17:35.
Published in: |
August 20, 2008 - 17:00, Financial Express
Bring Break-Even to the Bottom of the Pyramid

How much does the global slowdown impact India? What should be the corporate structures and strategies to weather the current storm? Can India overcome the growth blip? Which sector is in need of urgent reform? We put these questions to management guru Prof CK Prahalad, who was in the city for a CII session on ‘India@75: The emerging agenda’.
Submitted by Francisco Noguera on August 18, 2008 - 19:34.
Published in:

While attending the SEKN research colloquium a few days ago, I was able to sit down and talk to Harvard Business School Professor Michael Chu. During his tenure at ACCION International, Mr. Chu played a major role in the development of Mexico's Banco Compartamos. He currently co-leads the Ignia Fund, a for-profit BoP private equity fund focused on the Latin American region.

Following is a four-question summary of the notes I took during our hour-long conversation about Ignia and its prospects of transforming the BoP/SME investment landscape in this region of the world.


Francisco Noguera: What is the background of the team behind the idea of Ignia?

Michael Chu: My partner Alvaro Rodriguez holds an MBA from Harvard Business School, and his first job out of School was with ACCION International. He then moved on to be CFO of Grupo Vitro (one of the world's largest glass manufacturers), CEO of Farmacia Benavides (Mexico's largest pharmacy chain) and then CFO of Grupo Elektra. He also held a seat at the board of ACCION. For my own part, I worked for the Boston Consulting Group after earning my MBA from Harvard, and then did leveraged buyouts in the private equity industry with KKR before joining ACCION, by the time Bancosol was launched. I also served as President and CEO of ACCION and also started an investment fund in Argentina called Pegasus capital.

(This post continues past the break; click "Read More" to continue)

. . . . .
Submitted by Rob Katz on August 14, 2008 - 13:18.
Published in: |
August 06, 2008 - 13:00, Business Today
Prahalad's Plan

As the celebrations of India @60 wind down and as the national attention is consumed with problems of the moment—price of energy, inflation, debt relief to farmers, political realignment in the states—it is hard to focus attention on the future of India. The urgent is likely to drive out the important. Moreover, it is easy to get carried away by growth statistics of the past five years and feel “we have arrived”.
Submitted by Rob Katz on August 12, 2008 - 11:39.
Published in: |
August 12, 2008 - 11:00, Business Standard
The World of Globality is Not Flat

In his best-selling book The World is Flat, Thomas Friedman had shown how globalisation had flattened the differences between developed and developing countries in terms of access to opportunity and growth.

In Globality*, authors Harold L Sirkin, James W Hemerling and Arindam K Bhattacharya from Boston Consulting Group, show how, over the past two decades, a range of corporations from the developing world have begun to disrupt traditional paradigm of development and tilted the balance of competition in their favour with their predilection for "rapid-fire innovation".

What does this mean for the future of competition? Delhi-based co-author Arindam Bhattacharya discusses these issues with Kanika Datta.
Submitted by Rob Katz on August 11, 2008 - 10:38.
Published in: |
August 11, 2008 - 10:00, VC Circle
For Acumen Fund, ROI = Profits + Social Impact

The New York based Acumen Fund is a non-profit venture fund that invests in businesses that have a social and economic impact. It will invest in companies providing affordable, critical goods and services in sectors such as health, water, housing and energy. The geographies it focuses on are South Asia and East Africa, besides the US. Since it set up shop in India a couple of years ago, the fund has made equity investments in Kochi based ayurvedic chain, Ayur Vaid Hopsitals, Hyderabad-based LifeSpring Hospitals, Mumbai-based ambulance start-up service ‘Dial 1298 For Ambulance’, and Drishtee, a rural communications company. Acumen does not believe in a profit maximisation model and would invest only in businesses that benefit people socially.
They generally don’t invest at the idea stage, and also try and stay away from pure technology plays. They want to diversify into agriculture and nutrition in India and are scouting for investments in these sectors. They typically invest between $500K-$2 million in companies. Being a non-profit venture fund, it is often dificult to find companies catering to low income markets and matching the requirements of the fund, Varun Sahni, India portflio Director, Acumen Fund India, said in an interview to VC Circle. Prior to Acumen, Sahni has worked with both for-profit and not-for-profit organisations focusing on enterprise creation across India. He has also been an angel investor in a number of companies in the hospitality aervices, food and beverage sectors. Excerpts:
Submitted by Rob Katz on August 11, 2008 - 08:21.
Published in:

Guest blogger Monica Touesnard is the Managing Director of the Base of the Pyramid Learning Lab, a program of the Center for Sustainable Global Enterprise at the Johnson Graduate School of Management at Cornell University. She is currently working to expand the scope and reach of the BoP Learning Lab through the creation of an international network of Learning Labs with academic partners in Brazil, Mexico, China, Canada, Spain, India, and South Africa. Monica earned a general management MBA from UNC's Kenan-Flagler Business School with focus on Sustainable Enterprise and has a B.A. in East Asian studies from McGill University in Canada.

By Monica Touesnard


One can find various established economic activities within low-income communities: small shareholder farmers, moneylenders, microfinanciers, mom-and-pop shops, and many more. Though vital to base of the pyramid communities, these types of small businesses do not necessarily constitute BoP enterprises.

In that light, determining the distinguishing characteristics of BoP enterprises became a key discussion topic at the inaugural BoP Learning Lab Global Network Director's Summit this past June. This global network of institutions is actively engaged in generating knowledge about BoP enterprise development. As such, defining what it means to be a BoP enterprise is critical.

(This post continues past the break; click "Read More" to continue)
. . . . .
Submitted by Theresa Newhard on August 7, 2008 - 11:18.
Published in:

Many of us in the base of the pyramid community, myself included, often wonder, "is this business really making a social impact?" Sure, there are real indicators of success, but what action drove that particular outcome? As I ponder the social impact of business, I'm reminded of an old marketing adage: We know at least 50 percent of our efforts are working – we just don't know which half. (Hat tip to Brian Trelstad for bringing this up in a meeting.)

In order to build truly inclusive businesses, our sector must start tracking impact over time. This we can probably all agree on. But the challenge is not so much in creating buy-in around the idea of measurement, but in finding a way to integrate an effective and user-friendly system for doing so in an already resource-constrained work environment.

Because of these and other stumbling blocks in creating social metrics, Rob Katz and I were particularly intrigued by the newly released Measuring Impact Framework developed by The World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). This framework, which has been in the works for nearly two years, is designed to guide companies – from small enterprises to large multinationals – through the process of measuring and assessing impact, and making better-informed future decisions within the context of a larger development paradigm.

(This post continues past the break; click "Read More" to continue)


. . . . .
Syndicate content