Good Cloud, Bad Cloud: Multinational ICT vendors are pushing services in Africa, why the solutions are in Africans’ hands
Recently I attended a cloud-computing summit in Nairobi, Kenya, which carried the theme: “Re-imagining the evolution of ICT technologies in East Africa.” While attendance for the conference was limited, it was interesting to hear the cloud computing messages from global IT vendors including CISCO, Fujitsu and Microsoft, among others. I’m always amazed to see how global companies deliver exactly the same message in Africa as they deliver in the developed world, without any consideration for the differences in the markets.
But before I can share my opinion on where things are headed and what it means for connecting low-income and underserved regions, I need to draw a distinction between public and private cloud Internet connectivity for those readers unfamiliar with the subject. It is mainly based on a difference in the implementation and business model.
Public clouds are based on large data centers owned by cloud service providers (CSPs). They “rent out” IT resources on a “pay-as-you-go” or “pay-per-use” basis to the public. That public is basically anyone who has a credit card and can pay for the service. A good example of a public cloud is Amazon Web Services (AWS).
The key point with “public clouds” is that the cloud IT resources are shared by all customers. You can have applications from different customers running on the same server with the appropriate security to prevent them to see each other’s application. This is achieved by using a technology called “virtualization,” which enables applications to be moved freely from server to server, and to run different applications on the same server. It’s this sharing of IT resources between a large number of customers that allows CSPs to offer their services for such a low rental price. Typically computer server utilization in a cloud runs at 90 percent of capacity, as opposed to the 10-20 percent of capacity typically seen in a traditional enterprise installation.
Private clouds, on the other hand, are reserved for a single enterprise. Their IT resources are dedicated to that enterprise, and no other customers may use them. The reason it is still described as a cloud is because the enterprise itself uses the same virtualization technology as the CSPs to optimize utilization of their servers. The goal of a private cloud is primarily to reduce the cost of IT resources by reducing the number of servers required and through automation allowing users to allocate IT resources in a self-service mode.
The question then becomes: How does an enterprise choose between a public and a private cloud?
Jus one more data point: When the scale (mainly the number of servers units) of an IT infrastructure increases, the management cost per unit decreases. For a given scale (A), we have seen that the unit cost of a private cloud is lower than for traditional infrastructure. We can then easily compare that cost with the unit cost of a public cloud, which is simply the rental price charged by the public cloud CSP for one unit of IT. The public cloud unit cost is lower, since providers benefit from the economies of scale offered by their large IT infrastructure. (B) is the scale at which the unit cost of a private cloud becomes lower than the unit cost of a public cloud. So if we just look at the cost factor, a single enterprise should decide for a public cloud if their IT infrastructure scale is smaller than B.
What ICT Clouds Mean for Africa, ’A Continent of SMEs’
Now let me go back to that summit and explain why I think the global vendors are selling the bad cloud to Africa with no shame about doing so.
Africa is a continent of SMEs, with only 20 enterprises in Africa making more than US $3 billion year, according to the 2010 McKinsey Global Institute report, Lions on the Move. That means the majority of enterprises in Africa have a small IT infrastructure (when they have one at all), significantly below “Scale B” (above).
The only viable solution for most enterprises in Africa, then, is the public cloud. Unfortunately, there are very few public clouds in Africa. A few smaller CSPs are offering public clouds, mainly in South Africa, but none of the major CSPs have plans to deploy a cloud data center in Africa any time soon. The likely reason is that the market is not large enough and not yet ready from the CSPs’ perspective. The Middle East North Africa market opportunity for infrastructure as a service (IaaS) is unchanged from 2010-2014 at $100 million a year, which represents about $30 million for Africa, according to a forecast from Gartner.
The global IT vendors at the cloud summit were selling the private cloud to African enterprises using fallacious arguments to justify their private cloud offerings: “It is no longer a question of whether enterprises will use cloud computing – they already are,” a Fujitsu representative noted. But while that is true in the developed world, it’s not the case in Africa. As I have shown, this private cloud solution is inappropriate for African enterprises, because their IT infrastructure does not justify it. In fact, in Africa “Scale B” is probably larger than in the developed world because of the lower labor cost. IT labor being cheaper, IT teams can manage larger infrastructure for the same cost, pushing the limit B where a private cloud becomes justified even further away. But more importantly, the IT expertise to manage such complex technology is not available. That doesn’t seem to bother those vendors, since they will be glad to offer those expert services in addition to the infrastructure even if that solution is inappropriate for most African enterprises.
The hope for Africa lies in two factors. First, the rapidly decreasing cost of broadband Internet and the increasing speed of networks enables African SMEs to run their applications in public clouds located in the U.S. or Europe. Many African SMEs are doing this already today. As long as your application’s transactional data transfer is small (e.g. for an accounting application), this is quite possible.
The second factor is the emergence of smaller CSPs that are willing to invest in cloud data centers in Africa. Many understand that the cloud financial model in Africa is different from that in the developed world, where all enterprises have invested in IT infrastructure along with the associated IT skills investment. A significant cost reduction is required for a developed world enterprise to justify the cost of moving to a public cloud. So CSPs in the West are building mega data centers in order to offer the lowest possible cost and convince enterprises to place their IT infrastructure in a public cloud. In Africa, the situation is different. Most SMEs have no IT infrastructure or a very limited investment in IT. For those enterprises, a public cloud is the only way to get affordable access to IT. So any CSP in Africa who can provide a good cloud service, even if it comes at a higher rental cost than their peers in the developed world, will be offering a good value to African SMEs, because those potential clients will be comparing the investment needed to acquire an IT infrastructure (including the skills acquisition) with the cost of “renting” an IT infrastructure from a public cloud.
Consequently, the African CSPs don’t need to make major investments in mega data centers. In fact, a small data center will be able to offer acceptable renting prices. Furthermore, because most SMEs at this stage lack existing IT, they don’t need much power or storage to begin with. So CSPs are in a position to serve more customers with the same infrastructure than they could in the developed world, where customers require more power and storage for their legacy IT needs.
African entrepreneurs should take this opportunity to offer public cloud services for SMEs, since the public cloud market has been abandoned by the major CSPs. Do so before the big players realize their mistake. African innovators can understand African needs much better than the Silicon Valley companies. Africa, this is your opportunity to take!
Image credit: Flickr
- Technology, Telecommunications